Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Marky Martialist's avatar

I feel where you’re coming from in your excerpt there. On two levels, actually.

I came to similar conclusions about the need for stability and my own near-agnosticism about the exact nature of the stability. I don’t care what religion, creed, incentive, or whatever other culturally or even biologically engineered nonsense binds us together, at least not all the time. I have my preferences, and a certain way of looking at fairness, but they are socially constructed aspects of my own subjective views and I can get over myself if something new works. Or at least I hope so.

But the other aspect is internal. The stability and continuity is valuable precisely because people should be able to invest themselves in a perspective without it constantly being assaulted and having to change it. It’s lazy, but there’s the potential for trust in that laziness and I don’t know if trust can exist without it. So while I say I am aware of my own socially constructed frame and can be flexible… maybe not. Maybe I just haven’t figured myself out.

The main thing I know is that I have to watch myself today, because there are a lot of views people can adopt out there, and the main thing I seem to be able to count on is that they will adopt them in their self-interest. Some have a longer view than others, but when there’s a zero-sum game being played, cover your throat and spine. I don’t like this.

I don’t know if true belief is even compatible with society as e we know it, and I hesitate to say this, but we may be moving towards a situation where a soft surveillance culture is the only way to make life both livable and culturally reliable. I don’t like this, either.

2 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?